Announcing Bad Apple: End Smartphone Sweatshops!

Our new campaign, Bad Apple: End Smartphone Sweatshops, is working to bring light to the issue of unjust labor conditions in electronics factories in China, particularly regarding chemical use and worker health and safety.


Why Smartphones?

Roughly 75% of the world’s population now has a cell phone, and demand for newer, smarter, and cheaper gadgets is on the rise. Smartphones, like many electronics, are made in factories where workers regularly do not have adequate protective gear or training for handling toxic substances.  Exposure to dangerous chemicals can lead to cancer, leukemia, nerve damage, liver and kidney failure, and reproductive health issues, depending on the chemical and level of exposure.

There are thousands of chemicals that could be used in electronics manufacturing process—some are known carcinogens and others are largely untested.  Protective gear and rigorous trainings on safe handling are needed but rarely enforced, and often problems of exposure are not detected until workers are already sick.  In the case of benzene, there are suitable and safer alternatives that are only slightly more expensive.[1] Chemicals known to be harmful to human health should be banned and for chemicals with unknown toxicity, more testing is required.

Why Apple?

Despite Apple’s Code of Conduct that prohibits the handling of dangerous chemicals without training or protective gear, extensive problems persist.  Recent cases in Apple supplier factories have occurred in which workers have contracted leukemia due to benzene exposure[2], nerve-damage due to n-hexane exposure[3], and skin conditions due to handling acidic chemicals without protection[4].

Apple is the pioneers in the smartphone industry, and is the self-proclaimed leader on corporate social responsibility.  As a massive global company, Apple has the power to improve working conditions throughout the electronics-manufacturing sector by influencing both its suppliers and its competitors. There are safer alternatives to the most dangerous chemicals available and Apple can take the lead in using them until it becomes an industry norm to use chemicals that are not endangering workers.

Apple is also highly profitable, earning $37 billion in profits in 2013 in one year.  On average, Apple’s profit margins on iPhones are close to 40 percent, higher than any of Apple’s competitors. Industry experts have estimated that Apple could remove dangerous chemicals from its supply chain for less than $1 per phone.

Eliminating benzene and other chemicals known to be harmful to human health from Apple’s supply chain would help prevent more workers from losing their lives or livelihoods themselves because of occupational illnesses from making iPhones.

Join us in sending a message to Apple>>


Categories: toxins

Tagged as:


  1. You’ve lost my support by going after Apple, while joining the ranks of all the liars, cheaters and thieves who’ve built their business model on attacking Apple. Shame on you. Apple, an American success story if ever there was one, is at the leading edge of their industry on every ethical issue. But you need to prod them, and why? Only one reason. To draw attention to yourself. Well, that makes you the toxic narcissist, and you can bet I’m not the only one who will not support you because of this boneheaded decision. Samsung, Google, Sony, Microsoft, Nokia, HTC, they are ALL more deserving of your approbation. You have no credibility now, and there are many people who contribute to worthwhile causes who will see through this shameless attempt to smear a great company.

  2. When asking that out-sourcing companies support the United Nations Code of Conduct which prohibits child labor, exposure to occupational hazards, low wages, environmental pollution, etc., it is critical that companies don’t just give lip service, but send in their own well-trained inspectors to make sure these ethical standards are complied with. Withdrawing a contract for non-compliance is far more effective than just getting suppliers to just say they won’t do unethical things. For example, all the major chocolate manufacturers signed a document saying they don’t support child slave labor, yet without inspectors, this continues to happen.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s